2018/10/19

SANDY HOOK COVENANT; Only 10 Gun Shots Heard On Rick Thorne's 911 Call, 15 Minutes Long, BIG Problem (Post64)

2018.10.19 (AE) - This video is self explanatory… Sedensky and Connecticut Judicial decided to put themselves into a 5 minute box… this attack timeline is impossible, and I just closed the lid...








https://archive.org/download/SANDYHOOKCOVENANTOnly10GunShotsHeardOnRickThornes911Call15MinutesLongBIGProblemPost64/SANDYHOOKCOVENANTOnly10GunShotsHeardOnRickThornes911Call15MinutesLongBIGProblemPost64_archive.torrent

https://archive.org/download/SANDYHOOKCOVENANTOnly10GunShotsHeardOnRickThornes911Call15MinutesLongBIGProblemPost64/SANDYHOOKCOVENANTOnly10GunShotsHeardOnRickThornes911Call15MinutesLongBIGProblemPost64_archive.torrent


Please comment on this blog below.
Freedom of speech is paramount,
Joel

5 comments:

  1. I'm hoping that since you're a more seasoned researcher than I, that you might be able to help with something. As I was reviewing the gunshot analysis I noticed that Hegarty's call in #9 has 2 different times being quoted. 00175096 p. 7 and 10 both state 9:36:00. This is stated again in 00182028 pages 6 and 9. However, on page 3 it says that it was at 9:38:43, which is the same time given in her 911 call transcript 00154439.
    Is there something I'm overlooking? or is there really 2 different times being quoted here?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi CannibalCupcake333,
      Can you please repost your comment using either "Anonymous" or the "Name/URL" options.
      The reason I'm asking is because Google warned that any comments posted on Blogger using our Google+ profiles will DISAPPEAR whenever Google+ disappears (unbelievable).
      I think I have an answer to your question but I don't want all this work to just EVAPORATE.
      Thanks,
      Joel (AryanEmpires)

      Delete
  2. No problem. I'll also repeat my post just in case. As I was reviewing the gunshot analysis I noticed that Hegarty's call in #9 has 2 different times being quoted. 00175096 p. 7 and 10 both state 9:36:00. This is stated again in 00182028 pages 6 and 9. However, on page 3 it says that it was at 9:38:43, which is the same time given in her 911 call transcript 00154439.
    Is there something I'm overlooking? or is there really 2 different times being quoted here?
    Which one is the correct one?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi CannibalCupcake333,
      Thanks for reposting your question, we don’t want all this hard work to just EVAPORATE when Google+ disappears (as Google has warned).

      So I had a look, and I think I’ve found an explanation for what appears to be a discrepancy:


      9:36:00 = 911 operator audio file recording start time (for a number of parties).

      9:38:43 = Hegarty's 911 call start time.


      If you go to the actual 911 audio file "StartTime 2012-12-14 14-36-0 Logger 45170321 Channel 3 RadioREDACTED” you will hear other parties talking until 0:02:43 into the call, then you’ll hear Hegarty’s call start = 9:38:43 .

      I hope this makes sense.
      Cheers,
      Joel (AryanEmpires)

      Delete
    2. Yes, it absolutely makes sense. Thank you.

      Delete