Please rate & comment on YouTube, or comment on this Blog below.
Freedom of speech is paramount,
Joel
2018/01/21
SANDY HOOK COVENANT; Crimes, Entrapment By CW Wade, IMS Drive Data Theft, Intellectual Property (Post15)
2018.1.21 (AE) - This **EXCLUSIVE** video shows 100% PROOF of unauthorized access to the IMS Group’s online data drive… the access link was sent to me by CW Wade as a form of bait for legal “entrapment”, but I had no interest in the contents, and I’m well aware that all access to such drives is fully logged… this video shows exactly who illegally accessed this data, and it’s clear they copied / mirrored the entire data drive contents… this crime would fall under the California Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA) as “misappropriation”, the acquisition by improper means via “Breach” and / or “Espionage”… whatever the designation, it’s clearly a legal “Theft” of "Intellectual Property”, and the disclosure of “Trade Secrets”… however, all of this evidence means absolutely nothing unless IMS takes legal action...
Please rate & comment on YouTube, or comment on this Blog below.
Freedom of speech is paramount,
Joel
Please rate & comment on YouTube, or comment on this Blog below.
Freedom of speech is paramount,
Joel
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Hey! Why are YOU so precious and special to receive the "Boner Prize" IMS entrapment link? All I got was a poisoned duckie....;/
ReplyDeleteHi She's Not There,
DeleteI'm guessing they expected me to be stupid enough to access that link, nope ��.
PRO TIP: Don't put that duck in your mouth!!
Naw, no worries, the "kids on the plane can play with it" by W.H.
DeleteThat SURE is an interesting date J. Very interesting indeed. A funny thing happened on the way to the "county jail" around the VERY same time...
Naughty naughty CW Wade! I'm sure he'll do a video explaining himself soon.
ReplyDeleteFrank
Hi Frank,
DeleteMaybe he'll blame it all on "Jeff Dryden" ;)
Nice talking with you, good times.
He should blame it on those crumby straws from the In N Out and his crappy "demo" shooting....SO Disingenuous. Harumpf! Let's play "Scott Free" Again, can we huh?
DeleteHey Joel
DeleteIt was fun on the hangout. Got to speak Philby the communist and the Joelbot. Please do future live events earlier though. I was half asleep for the rest of the day LOL. OMG , not the straws! Who does CW Wade think he is; Dr Quincy M.E. ?
Love
Frank
Frank,
DeleteC.W. Wade did not commit any crime. The crime of entrapment ONLY occurs pertaining to an act by a Law Enforcement Officer. C.W. Wade is not a law enforcement officer, hence he did not commit a crime. Joel falsely accused C.W. Wade of committing a crime. Therefore, the only possible violation of law would be libel on the part of Joel. Philip
Dear Phillip Franklin
DeleteCW Wade sent Joel a link to the IMS drive, which if he had accessed could have constituted a crime under California law. Wade has portrayed himself as a independent journalist. I think that whether he's independent or not, his conduct in this matter is disregardful. Are we to conclude that CW Wade accessed this private drive without permission?
Honorably
Frank Jackson
Anon.
DeleteYou have a right to your opinion that C.W. Wade's conduct was " disregardful".
Yes Pillip, I do have that right. I would never conduct myself in such a way, especially around such a sensitive and tragic event. I don't like the hoaxers. I detest their methods, their members and the pain they have caused the families. However, that does not give CW Wade and his fellow HONR comrades the right to act in a similar manner.
DeleteFaithfully
Frank Jackson
Frank / Anonymous
DeleteI have no idea, nor any way of knowing if CW Wade accessed anything. From my vantage point, I have not seen C.W. Wade do anything wrong. I only addressed the obvious. I did not DEMAND an apology or apologies. If you falsely accuse someone of a crime then you do owe that person an apology. That is the right and mature thing to do. I notice you did not address my point that C.W. Wade did not " entrap" anyone. Unless told otherwise, your lack of objection or debate means you acknowledge that I am correct as to the crime of entrapment by C.W Wade never occurred. Furthermore, one must be extremely cautious , and positive before accusing some on of a crime. Lastly, as Joel did not object to my post, nor express any issue with it, I assume he is ok with it. Joel appears to me to be highly intelligent and more than capable of taking me to task if he finds my post objectionable.
Phillip
DeletePersonally speaking, I think CW Wade is a cunt. I also think you're a cunt too. This is what the honorable Wade wrote to Joel: "Hey...this is IMS's secret drive...i'd download it all before they figure out we are all over it." Sounds like someone had accessed that private drive, doesn't it. Why don't you ask Wade if he was deliberately trying to get someone into legal trouble with access to a private drive that he had disclosed to Joel by a link? Surely he should be asked.
Regards
Frank Jackson
Hi Frank Jackson,
Delete👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
CW's own words speak for themselves... why would you designate something the "secret drive" if it was open to the public?... and why would you encouraged someone to download it all urgently, "before they figure out we are all over it", if it was openly available public data?... the answer is clear, it was PRIVATE data.
I'll respond to Phillip Franklin if and when I find the time, not at his command.
Stay honorable and loving Frank,
Joel
Hi Phillip Franklin,
DeleteI will never apologize to an artificial entity which goes by the name “CW Wade”… this persona sent me a link to someone else’s PRIVATE DATA, and he encouraged me to ILLEGALLY access someone else’s PRIVATE DATA… he also encouraged me to “DOWNLOAD IT ALL”, which would clearly result in the THEFT of someone else’s PRIVATE DATA… whatever the determination legally, these activities are clearly wrong… as presented, these activities appear designed to put ME in legal jeopardy, with just one click, as this could easily have resulted in a warrant, and the disclosure of my identity, the ultimate goal.
On the contrary, “CW Wade” owes ME an apology… he provided me with a dangerous access link to something that could put me in legal jeopardy, and he did this with absolutely **NO WARNING**... on the contrary, he encouraged me to enter the trap with reckless urgency (by design)… these are not the actions of a “friend”, these are the actions of someone with an ulterior motive.
So long,
Joel
Joel,
DeleteI understand your position. I agree that CW Wade owes you an apology ,and that his actions are reprehensible.
Philip
Anonymous / Frank Johnson
DeleteIt saddens me that CW Wade is thought of in such negative ways. I only see what is on Sandy Hook Facts, which I have found helpful and informative. C.W. Wade , from my vantage point, is fighting the "Truthers" and debunking their absurd and insane conspiracy theories. I am sickened by what the "truther" community does and says, and support anyone who opposes them. I am dismayed to see such dissension and animosity amounts those who I support, and have respect for. This includes Joel as I know he fights the "truthers". It is a shame that a united front does not exist to combat the " truthers", who I abhor, and think are evil. I hope that the differences between all who support the Sandy Hook families and honor the 26 who were killed, are resolved, and a cohesive unit evolves to destroy the common enemy. I commend your support of Joel, and defensive of Joel. I am not sure that my post is so egregious as to warrant being thought of as a c**t. I never meant to upset anyone. I now know that the dynamics in the anti- truther community is more complex and volatile than I knew. I just recently saw it regarding Tiffany M who I thought was a strong advocate for the Sandy Hook victims and their families. I thought she was a strong and aggressive force against all those who said Sandy Hook was a hoax. I just ran into some information that she seems to flip flop, changing sides often. I apologize to you the obvious upset I caused you.
Philip
Joel,
DeleteI commend you all your work and efforts in debunking the insane conspiracy theorists who say that Sandy Hook was a hoax. I am saddened to see those, who I thought were all in the same camp, are fighting and being hurtful. This dissension and waste of energy, that should be directed at the despicable conspiracy theorist, is disheartening. I hope all of it can be resolved and unity established forming a strong union with the common goal of destroying the "truthers". I apologize for upsetting you. Respectfully, Philip
Hi Phillip Franklin,
DeleteNo problem, we're good... you've always been "anti HOAX", and that is the correct position.
I appreciate that you're willing to at least consider how things appear from my position, and I'm sure you've witnessed me being attacked, and embraced, by both sides.
Stay open minded, and remember... not everything is as it appears... stay tuned ;)
All the best,
Joel
Out of curiosity, would you be available to be a witness?
ReplyDeleteHi Anonymous,
DeleteOnly if I could do it "anonymously"... I'm sure you understand ;)
Very smart of you not to fall for the BS link, by the way.
ReplyDeleteHi Anonymous,
DeleteThank you... I had absolutely ZERO reason to access their private data... everything was wrong about it, legally, ethically, by general principal.
Cheers,
Joel
If only some of Our "Public Servants" actually HAD any ethics that has not been sucked away by the power of their positions or never existed at all, maybe some of these "issues" could be remedied and/or "the recommendations and accountability requested by the 2010 BATF Store front ops Congressional "hearing panel" (very few ?'s posed, btw)Shall begin to be implemented? I think many of us have heard enough and want concrete solutions by law to prevent criminal hoaxerism and incitement and a resolution of transparency w/i reason, for ALL the SH evidence. It's the very least the memories of the dead deserve. It's only right. If that takes a Victim's Rights Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as bi-partisan proposed circa 1995-6, then so be it. Full Stop.
DeleteBravo 👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
DeleteAs far as I know, its the illegal material found on the drive that always prevented IMS from taking any real action. I'm not surprised Wade would try to phish you with a link to who knows what.
ReplyDeleteSo you say they are all working together but you want one to sur another? #SoundsLegit
ReplyDeleteHi Anonymous Coward,
DeleteI predicted your crew would say that... nice spin, and totally myopic.
Try watching the video again, and read my text from above, it says... "the access link was sent to me by CW Wade as a form of bait for legal “entrapment”".
I have proof of "anti HOAX" working directly with "HOAX".
Bye,
Joel
As C.W. Wade is not a "Law Enforcement Officer", the crime of entrapment never occurred. As Joel represents himself to be an honorable person, I am sure he will forthwith give C.W. Wade an apology .
ReplyDeletePhillip, is CW Wade a honorable person?
DeleteFrank
Anon
DeleteFrom what I know, yes. I have not heard or read anything otherwise. As you can see by my post, I ONLY posted about a very clear fact. I avoid the chaos, infighting, and dysfunction.
Hi Phillip Franklin,
DeleteI will never apologize to an artificial entity which goes by the name “CW Wade”… this persona sent me a link to someone else’s PRIVATE DATA, and he encouraged me to ILLEGALLY access someone else’s PRIVATE DATA… he also encouraged me to “DOWNLOAD IT ALL”, which would clearly result in the THEFT of someone else’s PRIVATE DATA… whatever the determination legally, these activities are clearly wrong… as presented, these activities appear designed to put ME in legal jeopardy, with just one click, as this could easily have resulted in a warrant, and the disclosure of my identity, the ultimate goal.
On the contrary, “CW Wade” owes ME an apology… he provided me with a dangerous access link to something that could put me in legal jeopardy, and he did this with absolutely **NO WARNING**... on the contrary, he encouraged me to enter the trap with reckless urgency (by design)… these are not the actions of a “friend”, these are the actions of someone with an ulterior motive.
So long,
Joel
ATTACK ATTACK NEVER DEFEND!! ;P CCW is a twat! "Apology"? ROFLOLOLOL
DeleteFRAWWWWWDS! ox
Joel,
ReplyDeleteAs mentioned in an early post, you owe C.W. Wade an apology for falsely accusing him of a crime which he did not commit. As you hold yourself out to be an honorable, decent, and moral person, I am confident you will do so soon. Philip
Phillip, do you believe that CW Wade accessed the IMS private drive?
DeleteFrank Jackson
Phillip, you are coming across slightly disingenuously by demanding apologies to a person whom is not yourself.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteHi Phillip Franklin,
DeleteI will never apologize to an artificial entity which goes by the name “CW Wade”… this persona sent me a link to someone else’s PRIVATE DATA, and he encouraged me to ILLEGALLY access someone else’s PRIVATE DATA… he also encouraged me to “DOWNLOAD IT ALL”, which would clearly result in the THEFT of someone else’s PRIVATE DATA… whatever the determination legally, these activities are clearly wrong… as presented, these activities appear designed to put ME in legal jeopardy, with just one click, as this could easily have resulted in a warrant, and the disclosure of my identity, the ultimate goal.
On the contrary, “CW Wade” owes ME an apology… he provided me with a dangerous access link to something that could put me in legal jeopardy, and he did this with absolutely **NO WARNING**... on the contrary, he encouraged me to enter the trap with reckless urgency (by design)… these are not the actions of a “friend”, these are the actions of someone with an ulterior motive.
So long,
Joel
Anon,
ReplyDeleteI have no idea, nor any way of knowing. I only addressed the obvious. I did not DEMAND an apology or apologies. If you falsely accuse someone of a crime then you do owe that person an apology. That is the right and mature thing to do. I notice you did not address my point that C.W. Wade did not " entrap" anyone. Unless told otherwise, your lack of objection or debate means you acknowledge that I am correct as to the crime of entrapment by C.W Wade never occurred. Furthermore, one must be extremely cautious , and positive before accusing some on of a crime. Lastly, as Joel did not object to my post, nor express any issue with it, I assume he is ok with it. Joel appears to me to be highly intelligent and more than capable of taking me to task if he finds my post objectionable.
Hi Phillip Franklin,
DeleteI will never apologize to an artificial entity which goes by the name “CW Wade”… this persona sent me a link to someone else’s PRIVATE DATA, and he encouraged me to ILLEGALLY access someone else’s PRIVATE DATA… he also encouraged me to “DOWNLOAD IT ALL”, which would clearly result in the THEFT of someone else’s PRIVATE DATA… whatever the determination legally, these activities are clearly wrong… as presented, these activities appear designed to put ME in legal jeopardy, with just one click, as this could easily have resulted in a warrant, and the disclosure of my identity, the ultimate goal.
On the contrary, “CW Wade” owes ME an apology… he provided me with a dangerous access link to something that could put me in legal jeopardy, and he did this with absolutely **NO WARNING**... on the contrary, he encouraged me to enter the trap with reckless urgency (by design)… these are not the actions of a “friend”, these are the actions of someone with an ulterior motive.
So long,
Joel
Goodjob Joel, Honr Network does the opposite of helping anything. What they have done is increase the numbers of Sandy Hook Truthers.
ReplyDeleteHi Caliberhitter,
DeleteThanks... I know we don't get along, but I thought you'd like to know about this.
Theft of PRIVATE DATA is not cool, just saying.