2018/03/04

SANDY HOOK COVENANT; Suppressed Evidence, COVERUP List (Post26)

2018.3.4 (AE) - This video discusses a long list of evidence that’s been completely suppressed in the Sandy Hook case… in my opinion this proves deception… I call it the “COVERUP List"...








https://archive.org/download/SANDYHOOKCOVENANTSuppressedEvidenceCOVERUPList/SANDYHOOKCOVENANTSuppressedEvidenceCOVERUPList_archive.torrent

https://archive.org/download/SANDYHOOKCOVENANTSuppressedEvidenceCOVERUPList/SANDYHOOKCOVENANTSuppressedEvidenceCOVERUPList_archive.torrent


Please comment on this blog below.
Freedom of speech is paramount,
Joel


35 comments:

  1. Hey! I found THIS ^^^^^^^^Interesting as Always!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi She's Not There,
      Good job, you might be the only one!!

      Delete
  2. Replies
    1. Hi She's Not There,
      They claim there was no mask, but multiple witnesses said the shooter was wearing a mask.

      Delete
  3. Why scrub all this stuff when it could have been used by the public to spot future shooters like the Parkland shooter...No problem releasing ALL of his Juvie/health info? Hmmm...? Still alive too.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Joel

    Good overview of those issues that everybody should be talking about. But instead we get crap from third rate professors, neo-nazis, fear mongers and dodgy school safety offers.

    Regards
    Frank Jackson

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If "talking about it" was O.K., they wouldn't "pull the plug" on harmless live chats as soon as "gun issue" got broached...would they? Next time issue MUST be addressed Immediately and not waste time on "rudimentary"chit chat
      designed to distract..? Dive straight in...The NRA stuff was timed perfectly, Joel...The recent "stolen guns" cases involving "blameless" retailers are a joke. No CCTV, no serial numbers?, no sketches? Tet, "call for help from public"? How about a law for corps that everyday people have to abide by or be locked up that is on the books now? If One keeps TNT, Pit Bulls or killer bees, they are "strictly liable". The "gun stores" should be liable for not securing their stock and bump stocks! :)
      Respect

      Delete
  5. A "pre-recorded" "Anon" bit may work out better, just a thought. Then, you will have "complete" "anti-troll" control and can have it more "blog-worthy" on your back porch of Infinity postings...Why have no "experts" weighed-in on these Obvious questions? Especially, the re-victimizing of victims...? Where is that old dusty bi-partisan proposed "Victim's Rights Amendment"? Why hasn't it been dragged out again? Afraid it might gain traction Now? After the Nasser Vivtims' impact statements, many are wondering...State and Fed playing "Jurisdictional Charging Games" again...Here's a new one that went straight to feds..See: William John Eastering, Jr. failed Rep. GOP candidate, FOSTER HOME ABUSES, CPS had NOTICE just like Nasser, but didn't shut it down, just like Nasser! The feds are grabbing cases that should be heard in State Courts, just like Nasser ;) It's getting harder to "hide" these bastards and their pals who hurt children by playing the "jurisdiction" game. Despicable. Amazing how ALL these "anti-gun" activists just SKIP over the Newtown/Lanza scrubbed RED FLAGS!? "Dr. Murray" and his "Bell Curve" slop was DRIVEN of of "Middlebury" by a Mob!? bwahaha! http://fox17online.com/2018/03/01/grand-haven-man-arrested-on-federal-child-exploitation-charges/

    ReplyDelete
  6. Yes She's Not There, isn't it strange how the 'anti gun' lobby haven't got involved in those red flags. Good point!

    Frank Jackson

    ReplyDelete
  7. Joel

    Any news on the parents court case?

    Frank

    ReplyDelete
  8. http://www.courant.com/news/connecticut/hc-news-sandy-hook-supreme-court-argument-20180228-story.html

    http://www.courant.com/news/connecticut/hc-sandy-hook-supreme-court-20180301-story.html

    More pussyfooting around The Courant's FIOA request for Lanza's drawings and stories. Why? Afraid it might contain something suggestive?

    Frank

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Frank,
      Yes, the COVERUP of everything Lanza is simply astounding... very few have voiced concern that they have been actively blocking important scientific data that would help psychiatrists and psychologist understand how this monster was created... therefore, they are allowing another event to occur, not trying to prevent it... how very strange.
      Thanks for the links,
      Joel

      Delete
  9. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Is this what you were asking us to look up on the internet?

    Frank

    ReplyDelete
  11. Naughty Joel! Bad Joel!

    Frank

    ReplyDelete
  12. You never have a real exclusive. LOL!

    ReplyDelete
  13. Hey Anonymous

    Joel discovered the 54 pages of redacted grand jury documents belonging to Nancy Lanza. Why does Joel and his views bother you? Are you CW Wade? Are you a police 'helper'?

    Fran Jackson

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Frank,
      Thank you... also the Xbox 360 evidence was my discovery, among others.
      I'm guessing Anon won't see your message because it's not a "Reply" to him... that's not your fault, there's a weird bug I've noticed in this system, you have to click "Reply" twice (sometimes) before it shifts over, and then post it.
      Thanks again,
      Joel

      Delete
  14. Doom's Plea on V-day? Plus Parkland...? Is the hoax over now and forever then , once and fer all y'all....lolol?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I do hope so. What was Doom arrested for? Something to do with a church?

      Frank Jackson

      Delete
    2. Sorry, that was Side Thorn. I'm stupid. I know why Doom was arrested. He stabbed someone.

      Frank Jackson

      Delete
  15. https://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2018/03/06/us/ap-us-church-shooting-harassment.html

    Frank

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Frank,
      Thanks, I hadn't seen that article yet.. the other article said Side Thorn was also packing a gun.
      The guy had to be on parole during all of the incidents and threats... no mention of this, or how he could have access to a gun while on parole.
      Cheers,
      Joel

      Delete
  16. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=15XGgwYhzRs

    Recent bomb threat

    Frank

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Frank,
      Thank you... I did noticed that clip early today, and I believe it's old, from 2014.1.10.
      The clip seems familiar, plus the Chalk Hill School is no longer used since the new Sandy Hook School has been occupied for a while now... no idea why they'd be uploading old clips.
      Here's a link to the 2014 incident I'm talking about:

      http://www.newsweek.com/bomb-threat-prompts-sandy-hook-elementary-school-evacuatiton-274576

      Delete
    2. Notice how the murder of Nancy Lanza is Omitted in that article? My my, that horrible "prepper" and NRA member!? lol Was there ever any "update" as promised by Newsweek? "Weird how they are uploading OLD clips"? I'll say!

      Delete
    3. Hi She's Not There,
      I did find the original posting on DailyMail... proper date is 2014.10.1 (I had it flipped around above)... this article includes the same video embedded...

      2014.10.1 Sandy Hook Elementary Evacuated & Classes Dismissed After Bomb Threat:

      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2776672/Threat-leads-evacuation-Sandy-Hook-school.html

      Delete
  17. Thanks for ALL the Links Frank and Joel!

    ReplyDelete
  18. Joel

    You raise the issue of the five homemade videos that were seized. You kind of question who filmed these videos and where they came from. Why?

    Thanks
    Frank Jackson

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Frank,
      This is a very touchy subject I don't wish to expand on any further at this time.
      My original detailed video on the "Five Homemade Videos" was strongly attacked... my video thumbnail was entirely tongue in cheek.
      Thanks for understanding,
      Joel

      Delete
    2. I understand Joel. I do tend to ask controversial questions :)

      Regards
      Frank

      Delete
    3. Hi Frank,
      You ask VERY good questions ;)

      Delete